A Loathly and Abominable Sight

In a curious (and very rare) book of ghost stories called Beware the Cat, William Baldwin, a printer’s assistant, describes the gruesome sight of the remains of drawn and quartered men displayed at Aldgate in London. He does not approve of the practice. The story, written in 1553, was not published until eight years later, perhaps because Bloody Mary did not like the implication that drawing and quartering was a practice of butcherly heathen tyrants.


At the other end of the Printing house as you en­ter in, is a side doore and iij. or iiij. steps which go up to the Leads of the Gate, wheras somtime quarters of men (which is a lothely & abhominable sight) doo stand up upon Poles. I call it abhomi­nable because it is not only against na­ture: but against Scripture. For God commanded by Moyses, that after the Sun went down: all such as were han­ged or otherwise put to death should be buried, lest if the Sun saw them the next day: his wrath should come upon them and plague them, as he hath doon this and many other Realmes for the like transgression. And I mervel where men have learned it, or for what cause they doo it, except it be to feed & please the Devils. For sure I beleeve that some spirits Misanthropi or Molochitus, who lived by the savour of mans blood did after their sacrifices failed, in whiche men were slaine and offered unto them put into butcherly heathen tirants heds to mangle and boile christen transgre­ssors, & to set up their quarters for them to feed upon. And therfore I would coun­sail all men to bury or burn all exe­cuted bodies and refrain from making such ab­hominable sacrifice, as I have often seen with Ravens or rather devils feeding upon them in this forsaid Leads.—William Baldwin, Beware the Cat, “The First Part of Maister Streamers Oracion.”

The Duke of York Is No Papist

In 1680, Charles II was on the British throne, and his brother James, the Duke of York, was the only heir. Rumors had begun to circulate that James was a Roman Catholic, and a certain pamphlet had brought those rumors out into the open. Patriotically, another pamphleteer (the librarian identifies him as John Garbrand) undertook to defend the Duke from these scurrilous charges. Here in his preface, our author warns his readers against the sinister designs of those who made the accusations. In fact, James did turn out to be a Papist, which complicated his reign somewhat when he inherited the throne five years later.


Courteous reader, Having seen a Pamphlet some time since, Entituled, Reasons whereupon the Duke of York may most strongly be reputed, and suspected to be a Papist: Not knowing, but that it may come into the hands of some, whom I would not have Poysoned with those fallacious Arguments; I thought it my duty to answer them: That the World may see the Malice and Rage of some Seditious Persons, who, by loading the Duke with Scandalous Aspersions, endeavour to lessen his esteem with the King: And, if that will not do, to brand his Reputation in the opinion of the Credulous Multitude; That they may the sooner introduce their own Maximes into the Government; which are not more fatal to the King, than Destructive to his Subjects.

Therefore, kind Reader, beware, and think not, whilst these Stigmatize the Duke, they are Innocent themselves: ’Tis their Guilt makes them endeavour to overthrow the Government; And, they had rather see the Nation Ruined than themselves brought to answer their breach of Laws: And observe it when you will, Whoever shall go about to Fortify the present Government against Faction, and Rebellion, shall, by the Seditious, be reported to introduce Popery; Or, to be Popishly affected: Knowing, at the same time they do so, they win upon the giddy Vulgar, who have no greater Antipathy then against the Bishop of Rome: And by this Device, commonly, they deliver themselves from that Punishment which they ought justly to undergo. And, this, to me, is a better Argument, that the Duke of York is no Papist; since the Seditious only would have him thought so, then, all the Reasons they have given, can, probably make him one. Your belief of this will compleat my wishes, which are, that you may be Happy, Farewel.

——The Grand Inquest, Or a Full and Perfect Answer to Several Reasons, by which it is Pretended His Royal Highness, the Duke of York, May be Proved to be a Roman-Catholick.

It Is Easier than You Think to Make the Philosopher’s Stone

In 1635, a certain Scottish gentleman named David Person wrote a book about everything entitled Varieties: or, A Surveigh of Rare and Excellent Matters, necessary and delectable for all sorts of persons. Wherein the principall Heads of diverse Sciences are illustrated, rare secrets of Naturall things unfoulded, &c. The gentleman displays an admirable confidence in explaining everything that comes under his notice, having apparently determined that nothing was beyond his understanding. For example, he is quite certain that he knows how to make the philosopher’s stone, which would transmute any substance into any other; and he is quite certain that it is no very hard thing to make. Why, then, do chemical philosophers not make themselves absurdly rich? Well…


SECT. 4. That the making of the Philosophers Stone is lesse expensive and laborious than many things wee both use, and weare; why the makers of it enrich not themselves and others.

The true making of that Stone is neither expensive, nor long, nor wearisome to those that have the dexterity of it.

Betwixt the Barley graine that must be sowne, and the aqua vitae that is made of it, there is both a longer time, and many more points of labour: And betwixt the linnessed, and the linnen cloath wee were, there is a longer time, and much more labour than in the framing of Philosophers Stone, as these blowers would have the world beleeve.

It is true, many chymicall Philosophers so soone as they attained this precious Stone, the very knowledge of it delighted them more than worldly gaine; and they made more use of it in Physick than in projection. And if any would aske; what was the cause they made not themselves and all their their friends most excellently rich. It may be well anfwered, they lacked not, they had contentment, they delighted more in theory than practick: they disdained to bee gold-makers to those that were greedy, or to those that were through idlenesse needy, and were afraid to be made a prey and captivate slaves to avaricious and cruell tyrants: these things and such like made them obscure and hide from the world what they knew or could doe, intending rather to have by the Philosophers Stone a balsamick universall medicine than the seminary of gold.

Many have written divers treatises on this subject some one way some another way, some more mystically some more plainely; and what is darke in one, is found againe more cleare in another, specially to such as are diligent Readers of the Hermeticall Philosophy, I will therefore set downe here what by most approved consent of all, is the moft easie and compendious way to perfite the Philosophers Stone, without prejudice to others, that thinke they knew a better way. In this my discourse there shall be nothing obscure, but that which a filius artis may easily understand.

——From Varieties: or, A Surveigh of Rare and Excellent Matters, necessary and delectable for all sorts of persons.

A Rule and Instruction to Preserve Such as Be in Health, from the Infection

The plague hit London in 1603, and of course writers and printers were not slow to take advantage of the market for information that would prevent or cure the plague. In a blackletter tract, a physician explains the sound principle that you should stay away from infected persons as much as possible. Meanwhile, you can prevent the infection by making the world around you smell better. (Paragraph divisions have been added here; in the original there are none.)


When as (by the will of GOD) the contagion of the Plague is gotten into any place, Citie, or Countrey; we ought to have an especiall regard of the generall good, and by all meanes to study for their preservation who are in health, least they fall into such inconveniencie. First of all, therefore it behooveth every man to have speciall care that he frequent not any places or persons infected, neither that hee suffer such to breath upon him: but as Galen hath learnedly advised, in his Booke De Differentijs Frebrium, Chap. 2. Estrange himselfe as farre as hym lyeth, from their societie. The first and chiefest remedie then, is to chaunge the place, flie farre and returne late: Hipocrates, likewise in his Booke De Natura humana, saith: that wee ought to forsake the place whereas a generall sicknesse rangeth, according to the common Proverbe, Cito, longe, tarde.

And if necessitie constraineth us to frequent the infected, (either to be assistant to our friends, or otherwise:) every man ought to demeane himself in such sort that the sick mans breath doo not attaint him: which may very easily be done, if a man have the skill to choose & take the winde that properly bloweth towards the sicke & infected, and not from the infected to the healthfull: And therefore in that case the healthfull ought to keepe themselves under, not over the winde.

The first part of preservation, is to purifie and purge the ayre from all evill vapours, sentes, stench, corruption, putrifaction, and evill qualitie. For which cause, it is necessary to make good fumes in our houses, of sweet and wholesome wood, as Rosemarie, Iuniper, and Lawrell, or Bayes, and to perfume the whole house and chambers with the fume of Rosemary, Iuniper the parings of Apples, Storax, Beniamin, Incence, dried Roses, Lavender, and such like, both Evening and Morning. It is not amisse likewise at every corner of the street, (at least twice in the week) to make cleare and quicke Bonefires to consume the malignant vapours of the ayre, according as Acron the great Phisitian, commaunded to be done during the mortall plague in Greece: As Paulus Aegineta testifieth in his second Booke, Chap. 35.

It is good also to wear sweet savors and perfumes about us, such as in Winter time, are Marcorame, Rosemarie, Storax, Beniamin, or to make a Pomander after this sort that ensueth, and to weare it about us to smell too upon all opertunities.

Take of the flowers of red Roses, of Violets, of Buglos, of each half a little handfull, of the three Sanders, of each a Dramme, of the rootes of Angelica, Gentian, and Zedoary, of each four scruples; of white Encens, Cloves, Nutmegs, Calamus, Aromaticus, of each a dram, of Storax, Calumit, and red Beniamin, of each a dramme and a halfe, of orientall Muske a scruple, of Amber-greece halfe a scruple, of Ladaum infused in Rose-water one ounce, mixe all these together in Rose-water where in the Gum Dragacanth hath beene infused, and with a little of Rose-vinegar make a paste, of which you may forme certaine rounde Pomanders, to weare about your necke, and smell unto continually.

Or take of Rose-water three ounces, of white Vinegar, of Roses ij. ounces, of white Wine, or pure Malmosie two spoonfuls, of the powder of Cloves, of the roote of Angelica and Storax of each halfe a dramme, mixe them all together, and with this liquor it shall not be amisse to wash your hands, bedeaw your forehead & nostrils, and the pulces of your armes, for such an odour and of so wholesome a qualitie, vehemently repulceth the venome that assaileth the heart, and altereth the pestilence of the ayre.

——From A Treatise of the Plague, by Thomas Lodge. London: Edward White and N. L., 1603.

Making a Living as a Victorian Journalist

Is journalism a good profession for an educated young man who finds himself in need of an income? Anyone can do it, says our anonymous author. But that is the difficulty: anyone can do it, so everyone does.


As a mere money-coining pursuit, there is a good deal to be said both for or against journalism. It is emphatically one of those trades, aspired after by old Tulliver in the “Mill on the Floss,” which require no capital and are all profit. A ream of paper, a box of pens, a bottle of ink, a table, and a chair, are all the stock-in-trade required. You want no offices, no studio, no shop, to be a writer; you have no need, except in a very incidental way, to go to expense to keep up appearances; you require neither carriages nor horses, clerks nor servants, for the extension of your business. Indeed, access to a good library of reference, not in itself a very difficult or expensive object to accomplish, is about the only outlay absolutely essential to success as a professional writer. And, in spite of all that has been written about the difficulty of getting any sort of employment as an unknown aspirant to literary fame, we believe there is no trade in which it is so easy to get a start as that of journalism. To make a beginning is always difficult, but not more so, we hold, in literature than elsewhere. By the laws of trade, which no novice can defy with impunity, a briefless barrister cannot go and ask solicitors to give him cases to plead; a medical student who has won every honour and medal the faculty could bestow upon him, cannot solicit patients to employ his services; and young divines, burning with eloquence, cannot command the use of a pulpit, or enforce the attendance of a congregation. But a writer, without any breach of etiquette, may go and pester every publisher and editor in London to provide a market for his literary wares; and he must be singularly unfortunate if he cannot find any one disposed to give him a trial. Indeed, the facility with which any new recruit can get enlisted into the army of journalism is one of its defects as a permanent trade. Anybody may enter it when or how he chooses. We writers may conceive ourselves to possess an extraordinary aptitude for pleading a case, or curing bodies, or converting souls, but we can no more go and argue a case in court, or perform an operation, or preach a sermon, than we can fly without wings. But any barrister or curate or surgeon, or, for that matter, any apothecary, attorney, or minister, may come and poach upon our premises to-morrow; and if he can but hit his game, his services as a literary sportsman are as valuable as ours. But this accessibility of journalism to all comers, though it depreciates what we may term the net value of the calling, offers great attractions to young men in search of a profession, who have neither connection nor opening. No doubt if a man chooses to commence his literary career by writing epic poems, or five act dramas, or philosophical treatises, he may be a long time, whatever his merits are, before he finds a means of making his voice heard; but if he produces such articles as are fitted for general consumption, he will have no difficulty in finding a purchaser. Anybody, for instance, who wants employment as a journalist, has really nothing to do except to write letters to a paying newspaper on any subject of passing interest; and if his letters are good enough to secure insertion, he will be certain, sooner or later, to have the chance given him of trying his hand as a professional writer.

When the neophyte has once secured a periodical which admits his contributions, it rests with him to push his advantage. It is not as in other trades, where, whatever may be the talent of the student, years of toil are required before he can command the same remuneration as his older brethren. As in the parable, the workman who comes in at the eleventh hour commands his penny equally with those who have borne the burden and heat of the day. No doubt the experienced and practised journalist, with a known name, will at first obtain a higher rate of remuneration than an unknown aspirant; but this is only because he is likely to turn out a better article, and what is more, has given proof that he can continue to turn out such articles whenever they are required. No very long probation, however, is needed for a man to show whether he has in him the real making of a periodical writer, and when he has shown that, his position is secured.

From these causes we hold that there is no pursuit at the present day in which it is so easy to get a start, or to earn a moderate income in a short time, as journalism. Barristers, medical men, clergymen, civil servants, merchants’ clerks, architects, and naval or military officers, would as a rule consider themselves fortunate if they cleared a couple of hundred a year by their profession at the end of some years of hard work and practice. Now, a writer in newspapers and magazines can hardly fail, with decent application and fair fortune, to make that amount at least in his first year; and this very facility of earning an income at first starting is one of the chief dangers of journalism as a career. The money is earned with no excessive labour; it is paid promptly; and every young writer thinks the amount can be extended indefinitely without difficulty. If for a couple of hours’ work you can earn a pound, let us say, by writing an article,—it can be shown mathematically that with six hours’ work a day you can obtain a weekly income of some nine hundred a year. The calculation would be perfect if it were not for the fact that it is a great deal more than twice as difficult to write two good articles a day as it is to write one; and also that, even if you could produce any number of excellent articles per diem, without any deterioration in the quality of the article produced, you would find it extremely difficult to insure a market for your wares. We recollect a young writer talking to us once about his prospects, and saying he had no fear about wanting money, as he could always earn his two guineas a day by writing before breakfast such an article as he had just sent off to his employers. With the wisdom of older experience, we pointed out that, even if he could send forth such an essay every morning, the weekly journal for which he then wrote would certainly not place six columns a week at his disposal ; and that, failing the paper in question, there was not a single periodical which had any demand for the sort of serial essay he had just excogitated. Of course our advice was not attended to; and equally of course, we may add, when our acquaintance was forced by circumstances to take to journalism as a profession, not as an amateur occupation, he found he could not earn his bread.

In journalism, unlike most other pursuits, it is not the “premier pas qui coute.” About taking the first step there is no great cost or difficulty; it is the second and third steps which are so difficult to surmount. Most young men of good education and fair abilities can put together an article which, with a certain amount of editorial correction, will bear insertion; and we take it there are very few men of the class we describe who do not know enough about some one or more special subjects to write creditably upon them. But, then, the fact that most educated men can do this renders the talent of comparatively little value. What A does, however good it may be, B, C, D, and so on down to Z, can do equally well; and therefore it is not worth anybody’s while to pay A more than the market value of his article. It is, we should say from our own experience, very difficult practically for purveyors of ordinary literary matter to earn much more in their second year than in their first; and their income, small as it is, is necessarily a precarious one. So long as a writer of second-rate calibre happens to satisfy the proprietors of the journal for which he writes, he may draw his three, four, or five pounds a week regularly without much trouble or difficulty. He does his work as well as any one else of the class, and if he were not employed somebody else would have to be engaged in his stead for much the same salary. But if the periodical falls off, as periodicals will fall off, or if from any change in his relations with the owners he loses the engagement, he is almost as much at sea as when he first commenced his literary career.

——The Saint Pauls Magazine, December, 1867.